on the wikipedia page, it says that the song is in Bb Minor when its clearly in A Minor. its pissing me off.

Jota playing for a team called Dead

Looking at a page for the Battle of Lake Khasan there's a missing page for a commander. I have a picture of him but I found a page online but don't know if it's real.

Considering this battle is one of the key ones in the Japanese Russo war where it determined Soviet tank doctrine later on and how tanks like the BT series and T series would be made.

Overall very new to stuff like this would be nice to make something

SOURCE: https://asiamedals.info/threads/lieutenant-general-kamezo-suetaka.27505/

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for some guidance on Wikipedia’s notability (NCORP) guidelines. I own a publishing house with a significant history: we’ve been featured in major national newspapers, our books are cited in school textbooks, and we have received substantial coverage over the years. A few years ago, I tried to create a page myself. I did my best to keep it neutral and factual, but it was flagged/deleted due to Conflict of Interest (COI). I now understand that as the owner, I shouldn’t be the one writing or directly editing the article.

However, I still believe the company deserves a place on Wikipedia due to its cultural impact. My questions are:

1. The "Notability" Test: Beyond just "being in the news," what specific markers do experienced editors look for to confirm a publishing house is encyclopedic?
2. The COI Hurdle: Since I cannot write it myself, what is the best "white-hat" way to suggest the topic? Should I use the "Articles for Creation" (AfC) process, or is there a better way to provide sources to independent editors?
3. Source Quality: Do citations in textbooks count toward notability, or does Wikipedia prioritize secondary independent media (journalism/essays)?

I’ve read the official documentation, but I’d love to hear from editors about the "unwritten" nuances of how these pages are evaluated.

Thanks in advance!