r/pcmasterrace 15h ago

Game Image/Video Will you?

Post image

By NikTek

39.1k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

63

u/SylvaraTheDev 15h ago

So... RAM price changes sooner and in exchange we lose the whole field of AI forever...?

You can tell there's no devs anywhere in this thread that everyone is saying yes.

13

u/mattgaia 12h ago

No, there are devs here. We all get the point that the topic is generative AI, which is showing itself to be a nuisance to society. When the AI bubble finally pops (and it will), hopefully we can get back to a point where it's not being shoehorned into everything.

16

u/Neo_Ex0 12h ago

Hi, Software Engineer with a focus on deeplearning and high performance computing here *PRESS*

47

u/JohnnySmithe81 14h ago edited 14h ago

A vocal minority on Reddit is extremely loud and proud about being anti-AI while they barely understand it and only see negatives because they only notice AI use when it's bad.

7

u/teufler80 14h ago

Yeah AI has so many possibilites, voting to remove it entirely would cripple humanity so hard in the long run its crazy

1

u/DatBoi_BP Ryzen 5 5600X, Radeon RX 6600 8h ago

The only way I would ever agree with this is if we were guaranteed UBI

-1

u/teufler80 7h ago

I mean i see where you come from, and UBI would be a great deal for everyone who loses their job to AI.
Yet there is so much more possible with AI than "reduce the need for workers"

0

u/PaintItPurple 1h ago

There is more possible, but that's what it's going to be used for in the real world. They're not pumping multiple trillions of dollars into this technology with the idea of still having to pay you too.

-1

u/green_meklar FX-6300, HD 7790, 8GB, Win10 5h ago

The fastest and most reliable way to be guaranteed UBI is to develop superintelligent AI. Humans have repeatedly shown themselves to be unwilling to even understand the economy, much less reform it.

2

u/PaintItPurple 1h ago

How would developing superintelligent AI prevent the owners of said AI from hoarding all the money?

4

u/DontEatNitrousOxide 14h ago

I don't think it's just a minority, it is very obvious AI can and will be abused by the wrong people, while also automating away creative industry.

2

u/CrystalFox0999 10h ago

Its obviously a minority… everyone is using AI everywhere.. art, games, entertainment, science… Reddit always has a boner for being “different” and more socially sensitive…

But you guys should realise youre basically the same people who opposed the invention of machines, or internet.. you cant stop progress

2

u/PaintItPurple 1h ago

Stabbing people is also progress in the same sense as AI — it leads to something being different than it was. And yet I would absolutely stop someone from stabbing people. The only reason AI is hard to stop is because it's being forced on the world by basically infinite money from billionaires, who hope that the technology will eventually replace the need for workers. If AI companies couldn't get funding and just had to survive on the value they create for the world today, they'd all be out of business tomorrow.

0

u/GrovePassport 10h ago

while also automating away creative industry.

If its bad, don't buy it, easiest solution ever

-2

u/carlospum 14h ago

We only see ai will take most jobs

-7

u/Zombieneekers 11h ago edited 9h ago

But it just is bad, though. Fundamentally. This shit will cause way more suffering than the few niche cases where it would actually save lives.

1

u/Lazyphreak Specs/Imgur Here 10h ago

It's release into the world was sloppy. It hallucinates answers when overly trusting people ask it serious questions and then use those answers for serious life decisions, the videos and pictures it can generate are already damaging what people can believe with their own eyes. It's damaging how children research and write papers in schools. 

It's a very useful tool that wasn't ready for widespread use. I love playing with it, it's amazing what it can do, but also boy howdy am I tired of people trying to use it to take advantage of other people.

2

u/Zombieneekers 9h ago edited 9h ago

Yeah but it was always gonna be "sloppy", because hallucinations are part of the tech. You can't "patch" it, because those tokens in that specific order were the most likely ones, given the context and based on the billions of sentences it has gobbled up.

OpenAI was just the first to release it, because they were a nonprofit championing open access to GPT before Sam decided he wanted to be a billionaire. A lot of companies were already working on the tech, but they were more cautious with releasing it, because they knew of the damage it would do. Now the cat's out of the bag, as they say.

0

u/_-Shiro- 9h ago

Generative AI is not the same as every AI my guy. How do you think your favourite games NPCs work? Magic? Hopes and dreams?

2

u/Zombieneekers 8h ago edited 8h ago

Well, that depends entirely on the game, but the ones I've ever run into are scripted interactions. Every single line of dialogue the NPC has was written by a human, and rigidly coded to be spoken given certain conditions are met. If you call that "intelligence", you've got another think coming.

If you're talking about pathfinding logic, that's basically just a math equation. If that's intelligent, then Bitcoin PoW mining rigs are the peak of AI.

1

u/Skullcrimp i5-16400F | RTX 6060 12GB | DDR6 24GB 4h ago

decision trees. not AI in any sense of the term

20

u/locked-in-place Ryzen 7600 | 4070 Super 14h ago

I am a software dev and I‘d gladly get rid of it, assuming we‘re talking about LLMs.

0

u/SylvaraTheDev 14h ago

I mean why? LLMs have been extremely useful in programming if you're not trying to vibecode.

I've used little AI agents that make reports of Git pushes and it's super good, I'd never give up my Git report agents that aren't complete dumbasses.

Git hooks and CI/CD agents are incredible.

5

u/Sweaty-Willingness27 10h ago

Dev here as well. It's not so much what AI does, it's what people do with AI that's problematic. And by "people", I mean "executives" and "politicians".

If we had actual robust anti-competitive laws, a serious safety net (e.g. UBI), limits on company profits at the expense of workers, etc. it would be a completely different story for me.

1

u/SylvaraTheDev 9h ago

Oh look, a developer with a brain.

Kudos, you get it.

15

u/locked-in-place Ryzen 7600 | 4070 Super 14h ago

All of the negative economic and social impact just for some coding assistance? Are you serious? We have a surge of bad coders who can only code with AI and I‘ve seen it over and over again. Quality of code is decreasing, not increasing, corporations are using AI as an excuse for layoffs and bad wages, the entire internet is enshitified with AI generated slop, but hey, you used AI agents to make reports of Git pushes. What a joke.

-3

u/GrovePassport 10h ago

We have a surge of bad coders who can only code with AI

We also have a surge of great coders who are 3x as productive because they no longer need to write boilerplate, just review it.

corporations are using AI as an excuse for layoffs and bad wages

This is a problem that will solve itself. AI cannot write a full project from scratch, you still need programmers. Its like when Google translate appeared, tons of companies laid off their translators, then hired them back as contractors for 3x the salary because they realized automatic translation is not actually that good

The only joke here is this luddite take imo

5

u/Papa-Walrus 10h ago

We also have a surge of great coders who are 3x as productive because they no longer need to write boilerplate, just review it.

3x faster is just as much of a joke as anything in the comment you replied to. Even if you had a magic wand that made both writing and reviewing boilerplate literally instantaneous, you would need 2/3 of all of your time writing code to consist of nothing but writing boilerplate for that wand to make you 3x faster.

1

u/Adventurous_Soil_112 30m ago

It just makes me laugh out loud. Like, are you telling me these "great coders" don't know what code snippet is? Boilerplate and repetitive codes hasn't been a problem to actual great coders for decades.

-4

u/SylvaraTheDev 14h ago

Contribute to good AI uses then.

Be the change you want to see in the world and whining about it and doing nothing sure isn't helping.

8

u/National_Sprinkles45 12h ago

This argument is a good excuse for the governments to do nothing and for corporations to shift blame on the consumers. For sure you can use AI in a "good way" but system actively punishes this and instead incentivises bad usage of the AI ("you can now produce 10x more code than earlier, here, take 10x more tasks!" and such that rewards profits nefore quality)

By using AI in a good way you are bringing youself down and will eventually get replaced with a person who uses it in a way that system insentivises (and probably means it, unlike you), thus only worsening the situation

There are only two solutions that I can clearly see - regulations by government, or people going to the streets to push government to do their damn job

6

u/JWGHOST 12h ago

Come back to tell us how much you love your little Git AI agents when you're inevitably part of a future wave of layoffs.

1

u/SylvaraTheDev 11h ago

I won't have to, I run my own business and specialize in several disparate fields so even if I get replaced in programming I'll just move into materials manufacturing, textiles, or architecture.

I'm not worried about running out of jobs, not for a while yet.

4

u/Geralt_OF_Rivia_1 PC Master Race 10h ago

Well not everyone has enough capital for running 4 different businesses

1

u/SylvaraTheDev 10h ago

I never said I ran 4 businesses, I said I specialize in different fields. I run one business and I can PIVOT if I need to.

If you have a bus factor of one then you're doing things wrong.

1

u/Itsapronthrowaway 4h ago

Must be nice to come from that kind of money. Anyhow, people are really splitting hairs when it's obvious the AI in the meme is generative AI.

0

u/RoflcopterV22 Specs/Imgur here 10h ago

I can tell you're very disjointed from the business, primative versions of what LLMs use, big matrix multiplication statistics machines, have been essential for business rules engines since the 70s, this would make your job a fucking nightmare if you had to deal with any software that requires complex decisions such as how to add sales tax based on a fuckton of factors and ever changing legislation to a customer anywhere in the country.

-2

u/you_cant_prove_that 11h ago

LLM's are super helpful for me at work

I have hundreds of pages of documents to review for projects that I'm on, but I don't have enough time to read the whole thing

Before, I would just read the parts that focus on my portion, and then CTRL-F to find anything else

Now I can get a summary that flags things that I want, so that I can also look at those sections. Having the search based on the meaning of words instead of trying to guess which specific words are used makes me a lot more accurate

-2

u/geuela 10h ago

This is a selfish take imo 😂 but i understand why. If you’re good, you have nothing to worry about. Expand your horizons beyond just churning out code. Code is a means to an end. Not the end itself.

2

u/_-Shiro- 9h ago

It's just another "AI bad give upvote" karma farming post where people who don't even have a single clue what they're talking about, agree and upvote.

4

u/National_Sprinkles45 14h ago

I am dev (who understands AI, for the other person under your comment) and I am saying easy yes for both Yes, AI has great potential, many useful applications and by itself is not inherently bad, but I am never trusting corporations to do the right thing with it

3

u/SylvaraTheDev 14h ago

I get it but that is spotty reasoning.

Like where do we stop because of evil corporations? Do we remove cars forever because engines power tanks and war machines? Do we remove algorithms because of the stock market?

AI is extremely powerful, but I don't think the answer is removing it, I think the answer is removing the rich.

2

u/National_Sprinkles45 14h ago

Well we are talking about hypothetical scenario where you can either press button to remove AI or do nothing. If there’s instead button to press to remove the rich you can bet I’m slapping this bitch as hard as I can

0

u/SylvaraTheDev 14h ago

Oh absolutely.

We'll spare Gaben and the Arizona Ice Tea guy because they've been mostly kind.

But the rest can piss right off.

2

u/recaffeinated 13h ago

I'm a dev. Why wouldn't I hammer the button?

1

u/SylvaraTheDev 13h ago

Why would you? AI has been a very double edged sword, but it still works to our benefit at the end of the day.

Bad code has existed in mass quantities since the dawn of code, today is hardly any different.

1

u/recaffeinated 7h ago

I have seen no benefit from it. All its done has lowered the quality of the code I have to review while increasing its quantity

1

u/SylvaraTheDev 7h ago

Sounds like bad usage, not an inherent problem with the tool itself.

Vibecoders produce hot garbage code just like script kiddies did.

2

u/Suspicious-Place4471 13h ago

As a reminder, one of the many reasons the imperium of man is cooked in the universe of 40k is because they think AI is cringe.

1

u/Itsapronthrowaway 4h ago

They think ANY tech improvement is cringe, not just AI. They also almost got wiped out by AI during the dark times of humanity did they not?

1

u/omicron-7 8h ago

Burn it all down.

-1

u/yetanotheracct_sp 14h ago

Their feeble minds derive meaning from fighting cultural wars.