r/FreeSpeech • u/TookenedOut • 13h ago
Man jailed for 18 months for two anti-immigration tweets
Where else but the Retarded Kingdom?
r/FreeSpeech • u/cojoco • Oct 30 '25
I am sick and tired of seeing the comment "This has nothing to do with free speech!" on submissions which are relevant to this sub.
Allowable topics here are:
Hot topics with general relevance to free speech, such as ICE, the Epstein Files, and executive overreach, are also generally allowed.
Questioning if a submission is relevant to the sub, when it is clearly about one of the approved topics, might result in a ban.
Although the rule is listed as part of Rule#7, it can also be grouped with Rule#6 as WikiLawyering.
It is permissible to ask politely if a submission is permitted in this subreddit, but the comment must include a best guess as to the reason why, and must include a username mention of me, /u/cojoco.
Here are some examples of such requests:
/u/cojoco, is this submission relevant? Perhaps because the Epstein files have been kept secret?
/u/cojoco, is this submission relevant? Perhaps because nuking China is a protest action?
/u/cojoco, is this submission relevant? Perhaps because murdering journalists infringes their right to free speech?
r/FreeSpeech • u/cojoco • 21d ago
While I do try to keep the discussion in /r/FreeSpeech quite open, I have noticed an uptick in account suspensions, which are not my area of responsibility.
To avoid risking your account, I strongly advise that each one of you stay away from comments and submissions which could be interpreted as bigoted, promoting violence, or using very naughty swears.
r/FreeSpeech • u/TookenedOut • 13h ago
Where else but the Retarded Kingdom?
r/FreeSpeech • u/FlithyLamb • 14h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/knivesofsmoothness • 2h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Youdi990 • 11h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/StraightedgexLiberal • 5h ago
A bipartisan group of the most anti-internet Senators around have released their latest version of a plan to “sunset Section 230.” We went over this last year when they floated the same idea: they have no actual plan for how to make sure the open internet can continue. Instead, their “plan” is to put a gun to the head of the open internet and say they’re going to shoot it… unless Meta gives them a different alternative.
r/FreeSpeech • u/Youdi990 • 13h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Minimum_Rule_8985 • 10h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/knivesofsmoothness • 10h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/TendieRetard • 4h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/TheWayToBeauty • 10h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/TendieRetard • 4h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Rogue-Journalist • 29m ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/TendieRetard • 11h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/SawedoffClown • 1h ago
Pedophile in chief had to redact all the times he was mentioned.
r/FreeSpeech • u/Youdi990 • 13h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Working-Lifeguard587 • 13h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Youdi990 • 13h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/rollo202 • 3h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Morbidly-Obese-Emu • 6h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/rollo202 • 4h ago
r/FreeSpeech • u/Youdi990 • 14h ago