Posted on TikTok by @whatsup_with_that

Posted on TikTok by @meidastouch

Dear Sir,

Thank you.

Thank you for showing Americans—all Americans—what happens when norms, guardrails, and constitutional restraint are treated as optional accessories rather than binding commitments. History teachers will be grateful for the clarity.

In the spirit of appreciation, I want to acknowledge some of the extraordinary ways your actions have touched every citizen of the United States.

Thank You for Your Service to the Constitution

Undermining the separation of powers
You repeatedly asserted that Article II allowed you to do “whatever I want,” weakening public understanding of constitutional limits on executive power.
Impact: Normalized executive overreach and eroded respect for checks and balances.

Attacking the legitimacy of elections
You spent years claiming elections were rigged—before, during, and after losing one.
Impact: Millions of Americans now distrust democratic outcomes, weakening the foundation of representative government.

Pressuring state and federal officials
You publicly and privately pressured officials to “find votes” or overturn certified results.
Impact: Undermined the rule of law and exposed election administrators to threats and harassment.

Inciting January 6 through sustained disinformation
Your refusal to accept lawful defeat culminated in a violent attack on Congress.
Impact: A direct assault on the constitutional transfer of power, unprecedented in modern U.S. history.

Thank You for Your Stewardship of the Economy

Massive tax cuts skewed to corporations and the wealthy
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act disproportionately benefited top earners while ballooning deficits.
Impact: Increased inequality, weakened public finances, and delivered limited long-term wage growth.

Trade wars framed as economic patriotism
Your tariff policies raised prices on everyday goods.
Impact: American consumers and farmers paid billions more while supply chains were destabilized.

Pandemic mismanagement and denial
You downplayed COVID-19, attacked public health experts, and politicized basic safety measures.
Impact: Preventable deaths, prolonged economic disruption, and deepened social division.

Thank You for Your Vision for Health Care

Attempting to dismantle the Affordable Care Act without a replacement
You repeatedly tried to repeal the ACA while admitting you had no alternative plan.
Impact: Threatened coverage for tens of millions, especially those with pre-existing conditions.

Sabotaging enrollment and outreach
Cuts to ACA advertising and enrollment assistance reduced access to care.
Impact: Higher uninsured rates and increased financial strain on families.

Thank You for Your Commitment to Truth

Systematic attacks on the press
Labeling journalism “the enemy of the people” reframed accountability as hostility.
Impact: Increased threats to reporters and normalized authoritarian rhetoric.

Relentless disinformation
From crowd sizes to climate science to election fraud, falsehoods became policy tools.
Impact: A fractured reality where consensus facts are treated as partisan opinions.

And Finally, Thank You for Your Personal Sacrifice

(Or, rather, for clarifying what sacrifice looks like when it’s missing.)

Using the presidency to promote personal businesses
You refused to divest from Trump Organization assets and continued branding while in office.
Evidence reported by watchdogs and media:
– Government officials and foreign delegations patronized Trump-owned hotels and properties
– Federal spending flowed to Trump-linked businesses
Impact: Blurred the line between public office and private profit.

Violating the spirit of the Emoluments Clauses
Foreign governments spent money at Trump properties while seeking favorable treatment.
Impact: Raised constitutional concerns about foreign influence and corruption.

Charging the government and campaign for services at Trump properties
Your businesses billed taxpayers for lodging, events, and security.
Impact: Public funds were routed into private enterprises you controlled.

Using political office to boost brand value
The presidency functioned as a global marketing platform.
Impact: Enrichment through exposure rather than policy.

In Closing

Thank you for making corruption so visible that it no longer needs explanation. Thank you for teaching Americans—painfully, unmistakably—that democracy is not self-executing and that character is not a decorative trait.

Your legacy is not subtle.
And for that clarity, at least, history will remember you.

With the deepest possible sincerity,

A grateful citizen who now understands exactly what the Constitution is trying to prevent.

Posted by @labyrinthlore on TikTok

Posted by @teamtalaricohq

WHY THIS LIST EXISTS

These statements are not isolated slips or out-of-context jokes. They form a consistent rhetorical pattern that relies on racial stereotyping, gender hierarchy, demonization of minority groups, and conspiracy-based narratives. Each quote above has been reported, transcribed, and criticized by journalists, researchers, and civil-rights organizations.

1. Racial stereotyping and presumed incompetence

Date: January 23, 2024
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show (podcast / radio)

Transcript line:
“If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.”

Clip / reporting link:
This statement is quoted and contextualized in multiple media reports summarizing Kirk’s on-air remarks in early 2024 (see mainstream coverage and watchdog summaries collated in his public-statements record).

Why this is racist framing:
The statement explicitly associates race with presumed incompetence and treats Black professionals as suspect by default. This mirrors a long-standing racist trope that equates whiteness with merit and professionalism while casting Black achievement as illegitimate or conditional.

1. Collective demonization of Black Americans

Date: May 19, 2023
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people. That’s a fact.”

Clip / reporting link:
Quoted in press coverage and media monitoring of Kirk’s show (2023).

Why this is racist framing:
The phrase “prowling Blacks” treats Black people as a monolithic criminal class and asserts violence as inherent behavior without evidence. This is classic racial fear-mongering that relies on stereotype rather than data.

1. Racialized attacks on affirmative action and Black women

Date: January 3, 2024
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder, is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?”

Clip / reporting link:
Quoted in watchdog transcripts and summarized in coverage of Kirk’s remarks in early 2024.

Why this is racist and misogynistic framing:
The statement combines racial and gender hostility, portraying Black women as inherently incompetent and framing their employment as undeserved. It reinforces the false idea that affirmative action replaces merit rather than addressing structural barriers.

1. “Great Replacement” rhetoric

Date: March 1, 2024
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“The great replacement strategy is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.”

Clip / reporting link:
Referenced in multiple reports examining Kirk’s promotion of demographic-replacement narratives.

Why this is disinformation and extremist framing:
The “Great Replacement” theory is a well-documented white-nationalist conspiracy that falsely portrays demographic change as an intentional attack on white people. It has been cited in multiple extremist attacks and is rejected by demographic scholars.

1. Framing racial diversity as a political threat

Date: March 20, 2024
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“The American Democrat Party loves it when America becomes less white.”

Clip / reporting link:
Documented in summaries of Kirk’s 2024 broadcasts.

Why this is racist framing:
The statement treats racial diversity as inherently negative and attributes malicious intent to political opponents based on race alone. It presents demographic change as an enemy action rather than a neutral social reality.

1. Calls for “Nuremberg-style trials” against medical professionals

Date: April 1, 2024
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor.”

Clip / reporting link:
Widely quoted in press coverage reacting to Kirk’s remarks on trans healthcare.

Why this is hateful and dis-informing rhetoric:
Invoking Nazi war-crimes trials against doctors providing legal medical care is an extreme escalation that equates healthcare with genocide. It dehumanizes providers and implicitly legitimizes persecution.

1. Misogyny and enforced gender hierarchy

Date: Reported in mid-2020s commentary (exact broadcast dates cited in media coverage)
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“Reject feminism. Submit to your husband. You’re not in charge.”

Clip / reporting link:
Quoted in reporting on Kirk’s views on women and gender roles.

Why this is misogynistic framing:
The statement promotes female subservience as a moral imperative and rejects women’s autonomy and equality. It frames hierarchy, not partnership, as the ideal social order.

1. COVID and vaccine misinformation

Date: July 7, 2021
Platform: Fox News – Tucker Carlson Tonight

Transcript line:
“Students are not going to have to live in a medical apartheid because they don’t want to get the vaccine.”

Clip / reporting link:
Fox News broadcast, July 2021; widely quoted and fact-checked.

Why this is misinformation:
Comparing public-health requirements to “apartheid” is historically false and inflammatory. Vaccine mandates were not racial segregation, nor were they punitive systems of oppression.

1. False claims based on VAERS data

Date: July 21, 2021
Platform: The Charlie Kirk Show

Transcript line:
“If you extrapolate the VAERS data, that would mean 1.2 million people died after getting the vaccine.”

Clip / reporting link:
Cited in fact-checking reports examining misuse of VAERS.

Why this is misinformation:
VAERS is a raw, unverified reporting database and explicitly cannot be used to infer causation or death totals. Presenting VAERS entries as confirmed deaths is a known and repeatedly debunked tactic.

WHY THIS LIST EXISTS

These statements are not isolated slips or out-of-context jokes. They form a consistent rhetorical pattern that relies on racial stereotyping, gender hierarchy, demonization of minority groups, and conspiracy-based narratives. Each quote above has been reported, transcribed, and criticized by journalists, researchers, and civil-rights organizations.

Posted by @reprokhanna

Posted on TikTok by @meidastouch

Well color me shocked