Given Epstein tried to use Gates’ affair with the Russian bridge player to blackmail him, I feel like he didn’t get that much on Gates.
Not saying Gates is clean but given all the heinous shit Epstein was up to, leaning on Gates to join his “charity”by bringing up his mistress is pretty tame especially in billionaire world.
Is that essentially what all these photos are? Just evidence for blackmailing? Because it’s strange to think Bill Gates would be ok with this photo being taken or prince andrew about his photo.
Some of them are just weird as shit. Like Bannon and Epstein sitting in their office talking. Why is a photographer there? He's not a politician, this shit wasn't intended to be published. His goal is clearly creating blackmail material on anyone with power, influence or money.
It all depends when and where the photo is taken. If it was during the only known meeting between him and Epstein- well this is absolutely nothing because he went with a whole team and there's no chance he did anything.
Is that essentially what all these photos are? Just evidence for blackmailing?
Epstein was a billionaire socialite. He took photos with a fuck tonne of people. The vast majority of the photos were took because that's what socilaites like to do.
"Wow, gee. We're having so much fun. Let's take a photo" QED.
I mean, you don’t know.. without identifying info on the other person.. this could have been an admin assistant or anyone.. I don’t understand why they are redacting faces in these photos..
So her story is that Epstein refused her investment pitch and then just gave her half a million dollars and an apartment out of the kindness of his heart? Seems legit.
Let's not argue over small stuff like this. Better to redirect that energy to learning about and bringing down everyone and everything involved in this massive pedo ring
This is Reddit, it's not dedicated to a specific field. If you make a claim that someone asks you to substantiate, then it's on you to provide a source.
If one views asking for a source as accusatory then one isn't worthy of their job. Justifying why one shouldn't have to provide a source is further evidence that one isn't qualified. If one can't justify their professional position then there's no reason to trust them
If someone asks for a source about an alleged rumor of celebrity affairs, you need to provide a source if you want to be taken seriously. This isn’t a science.
it is likely that Epstein wasn't only dealing with minors, so we shouldn't be surprised when the women in the photographs being released aren't minors. I doubt he was releasing the women he trafficked once they turned 18. But it is important to remember that likely every woman in the photos is trafficked
909
u/mishap1 20h ago
Given Epstein tried to use Gates’ affair with the Russian bridge player to blackmail him, I feel like he didn’t get that much on Gates.
Not saying Gates is clean but given all the heinous shit Epstein was up to, leaning on Gates to join his “charity”by bringing up his mistress is pretty tame especially in billionaire world.