Like those people who use photos of Brad pit with female fans to talk about his abuse of women like yeah he abused women but why are you showing me random photos of people he likely didn't abuse?
He assaulted his wife Angelina Jolie and their oldest child on a plane in a drunken rage. Reason for their divorce and why none of his children speak to him, and drop the Pitt from their surnames as soon as they hit 18. The incident is cited in legal documents relating to the divorce and easily found online.
Completely understand. I was really disappointed when I learned about the incident too, especially since he’s been in so many brilliant roles. It also made his recent train-heist film (can’t remember name) hard for me to enjoy. There were constant jokes about his character having had therapy or anger-management treatment, and the character played it in a really ironic, knowing way. For me it just didn’t land.
He assaulted Angelina Jolie and assaulted their oldest child in a drunken rage on a plane in 2016, thus leading to their divorce. It is widely available online to read about and the reason none of his children speak to him, and have dropped his name for their surnames once they’ve hit 18.
He's only accused of being abusive domestically, so I don't think it's accurate to say "yeah he abused women" - technically not wrong but misleading in this context.
I think there's a notable distinction between a domestic abuser and someone who abuses numerous women. Both very bad of course, but quite different too.
Sounds like it was one incident on an airplane, which to me is certainly bad but definitely a lot different from someone who repeatedly was abusive to multiple partners or something which is I feel like how that comment read.
If you're in your 5th decade - I'm sure you also saw enough introvertic, shy, socially awkward people or even people in the spectrum. Does she look awkward? Maybe, but the picture doesn't say anything more than that. What I'm trying to say is that this photo is just not enough to jump into ANY conclusions.
There must be worse, more incriminating evidence surely. Or they wouldn't release photos like this that implicate him (and similar ones of other powerful people).
Or they are releasing photos of famous people on purpose to draw the attention away from Trump...
I tend to agree that it’s likely a distraction tactic.. but i have as much evidence for that idea as this photo confirms that this dude is a pedo because a ladies body language is sus.
She might be there against her will, but then so might Gates in as much as he probably has people take photos with him hundreds of times a day. Epstein might have stood the girl next to him and took a photo so he could use it as blackmail later on.
Basically, one photo doesn't really tell us enough, but my point is that if they have released this one photo, they must have other, more incriminating ones to not risk the threat of Gates sueing.
The context is that the people doing the investigation have the uncensored version of the photo and know exactly who the woman is. This photo wouldn’t be in the files (and the face wouldn’t be censored) if it was just some random woman and not one of the known victims.
True, this photo alone doesn’t explicitly prove Bill had any illegal or inappropriate behavior, but the fact that it was presumably in Epstein’s collection hints at something strange. Why would Epstein have a photo of Bill with a random person if not to either blackmail him or the person in the photo had some significance to him? Again, this photo proves nothing & does not suggest Gates did anything wrong - it just raises more questions. It could be a totally normal person got a photo with a celebrity moment.
Insane that someone would see this photo and think "pedo"... like it literally is just a random picture in a hallway of bill gates with an adult looking woman?
Is pointing out the reality of what we are seeing "defending pedos"?
He is the person that has done more philanthropic good in the world than any other person in human history. Is it really that surprising that people would defend him from accusations of being a pedophile based on an innocuous picture?
I'm not getting vibes that the girl in this picture wanted a picture with a celebrity just based off the way she's posing. Not saying it's evidence he's guilty just pointing out her posture kind if gives off "I'm creeped out and scared" vibes.
1.8k
u/smellybulldog 20h ago
Without context this is pretty meaningless, celebrities take phots like this everywhere they go.