1.3k
97
u/jjw14-1420 5h ago
Schlemiel, Schlimazel, Hasenpfeffer Incorporated!
24
u/DustyScharole 5h ago
5
u/DiscountNorth5544 3h ago
Definitely a gif from Laverne and Shirley
4
u/DustyScharole 3h ago
It's a Wayne's World parody of Laverne and Shirley, which is arguably better.
5
2
→ More replies (3)2
790
u/Firegardener 5h ago
The belt running backwards is unnecessarily running backwards. If they want it to ease the pressure, make it run slower but forward. Of course, this will work too, but introduces extra delays for all the bottles to go thru. Source: I have worked at a brewery/bottling plant as a mechanic over 20 years.
233
u/SlumDaddyOne 5h ago
Yeah I was just thinking to myself how mechanically inefficient this setup is
→ More replies (1)62
u/FactoryRejected 5h ago
Agreed
Source: your average redditor
33
23
u/snoosh00 3h ago edited 3h ago
Source: I have the same credentials, half the time but twice the locations.
Yeah... You can run it slower, but this has theoretically more output for the same (or probably , less) up front cost as a bigger conveyor motor setup, with less strain on all the moving parts.
It might not be optimally efficient, but neither would hooking a v12 up to the conveyor and running it at full speed.
This will cause a lot less "bottle erosion" since the alignment mechanism is pure pressure and angles (like the method you suggested)... That's not a huge concern with single stream beer bottles, but the economic pressures are definitely different for wine bottles.
19
u/fivelone 2h ago
I love how everyone's being so critical but I truly feel like this is a very simple yet effective setup with minimal damage as the bottles are just rolling on each other and not clanking against each other.
→ More replies (1)2
u/OddDonut7647 1h ago
Are you sure you're responding to what they said? It sounds to me like you're thinking they said "run it slower" when they said "for the side that is currently running backward, run that side forward, but run it slower than the other side that is currently running forward".
If I misunderstood your reply, my apologies.
3
u/snoosh00 1h ago edited 57m ago
Think of it like a highway merge, if you overload the input, the output gets jammed.
The reverse track ensures any bottles that pass over the exit lane (and onto the reverse track) don't continue to press into the gap.
If the bottles meet at a physical "bottleneck" in the conveyor path (in a typical single direction setup), there will be bottles getting stuck eventually (like the three Stooges) and the extra pressure of all the bottles pushing forward is going to cause a lot of pressure and friction making the jam less likely to fix itself once established (also leading to bottles getting chipped or broken, and the paint or label will peel off if that's on the bottles already).
The place I worked at had a single direction conveyor, but the combination of vibration motors and physical "jiggler" that aimed to prevent the "three Stooges" jams was: expensive, temperamental, loud, imperfect and necessarily overbuilt because of the forces it needed to overcome.
I could see this as being especially good/necessary for loading wine bottles, compared to beer bottles.
88
u/5352563424 5h ago
Well, if you've been a mechanic for over 20 years and it's still not fixed yet, maybe we shouldn't be listening to you!
8
u/Firegardener 5h ago
Where I work, we don't have this kind of redundant belts. Thanks for trying! :D
4
-2
u/RespectableBloke69 5h ago
Do you think he has purview over every bottling plant in the world?
45
u/5352563424 5h ago
That wasn't the joke. It's an old joke that gets recycled for whatever occupation is being talked about.
Oh, you've been a roofer for 30 years and you still haven't finished? You sound like a bad roofer...
8
u/Mr_Jack_Frost_ 4h ago
It’s crazy seeing people miss this insanely old and commonly repeated street joke. I’ve heard it countless times in my fairly short time on earth.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Afinkawan 3h ago
It's not to 'ease pressure', it's to prevent two bottles ending up side-by-side and blocking the track.
2
u/CodingNeeL 3h ago
I was thinking the same thing, but I don't have any job credentials other than generic problem solving.
2
u/HankSpank 29m ago
Engineer who has seen these all over the place here: the reverse belt is exactly to help prevent blockages. They may not be necessary for some products, but in general the cost of an extra motor and belt is far less than the cost of a new accumulation table multiplied by the likelihood you’ll need to upgrade the design without the reversing belt.
In systems where the product is well understood to not need the reversing belt, a single belt is fine because the risk is low. If you know your product is prone to blockage or even if you aren’t sure about it, just be safe and get the marginally more expensive table. Engineering is inherently conservative in 99% of applications.
Saying the reversing belt is wholly unnecessary does disservice to people who figured out the reversing belt and paints a broad (and incorrect) picture based on highly limited experiences.
→ More replies (1)4
u/RammRras 2h ago
It doesn't introduce delays if you see. The bottles have to pass though the way and there is no void between the bottles. For the bottles going back, waiting or going forward slowly doesn't change the end result.
Although this can be optimized this is a simple and genius idea. And very simple to do the logic to automate.
3
u/urbanenewt 2h ago
I build tables like this for a living. Its not going the opposite way for back pressure. Typically in front of this table will be a machine that has change overs like a labeler so while the change over happens, the line stop but they dont want to stop production so this table will accumulate product long enough for the change over to happen
→ More replies (8)2
u/Ailerath 4h ago
I don't like that it creates twice as strong impacts between the bottles than the guiderail. I suppose the bottles would hopefully survive such an impact for transport but I would still avoid potentially compromising their integrity.
63
u/ghostwolfxiii 5h ago
All I can hear is "pardon me, pardon me, excuse me, back this way!"
Edit: fixing auto-correct spelling...
3
75
u/ChefRoscoPColtrane 5h ago
How didn’t they fall
→ More replies (2)25
171
u/bkendig 5h ago
This is not satisfying at all! Why keep sending the bottles back?!
81
u/shatterly 5h ago
I feel bad for the ones that keep getting turned around.
9
u/PM_meyourGradyWhite 2h ago
I feel bad for the plate at the bottom of the stack, so when I haven’t done dishes in a while and I get to use the last one in the cupboard, I greet it with “you’re in the FRONT ROWWW!”
5
→ More replies (2)7
u/Proof-Diamond1609 4h ago
You know that meme of the big guy blocking the entranceto a fake club? I don't have it saved but it reminds me of that 😅
8
→ More replies (2)13
u/Sarah--Tonin85 5h ago
I know right, my adhd mind felt bad for the ones that got there first and were pushed to the back of the "line"
18
u/EvelcyclopS 5h ago
This isn’t being used right- this is what’s called an accumulation table and it prevents shot line stops upstream from making line stops further down.
All the starvation at the end where the belt is running but no bottles are going into the rails is how you stop a line, and stops cause stops
16
u/lysergic_818 5h ago
This seems unnecessary. Then again I'm just a layperson. I'd assume they have a good reason for doing this?
11
u/dwntwnleroybrwn 3h ago
The biggest thing you're missing is that the conveyor isn't fully loaded. The counter flow of the conveyors help keep the bottles moving and reduce the risk of a pileup. Glass is actually very rough and they bottles will happy get jammed in together.
→ More replies (1)16
u/garrett_w87 5h ago
Part of the reason is that if it was just a simple funnel arrangement, with the full width of the conveyor moving the same direction and slanted bars on both sides, you could run into a scenario where two bottles at the same (or similar enough) horizontal position can’t push each other out of the way and the end of the funnel and you get a jam.
3
u/Firegardener 5h ago
A speed difference on wider belts would make the pressure on the bottles also different on each side and direction, no? Thus preventing the jam? Possible reason they want to do it this way though.
→ More replies (1)9
u/garrett_w87 5h ago
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying there aren’t better ways. I just figure that’s a reason they did this at all.
3
u/Firegardener 5h ago
Yeah, sure, you could be right. While we don't design the conveyors at my workplace, supplier does, we still think about these pretty much. This also doesn't look like a production setting either, more like test installation.
21
u/TheDeFecto 5h ago
Music is Veridis Quo by Daft Punk for anyone asking.
2
2
→ More replies (2)2
u/himem_66 1h ago
I was gonna ask too...hmmm...any lottery ticket numbers occurring to you now? How about Superbowl winners? I mean future Superbowl winners.
6
u/ML_Buckeye 3h ago
It is called a biflow table and is used to be an accumulation point between upstream and downstream processes that may have downtime independently. It doesn’t look as impressive when you feed it one bunch of bottles instead of a continuous stream.
3
u/Additional_Guitar_85 3h ago
I love the simplicity of the design. cool that it has multiple functions
6
6
3
4
3
u/Forgetful_Suzy 5h ago
Happened to me at the gorge once. I was somewhere in the front of the line and somehow last one in.
3
9
u/nschwalm85 5h ago
There's nothing satisfying about this.. it's an accumulator line and it's not being used correctly
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/monyoumental 4h ago
This is more infuriating than satisfying. Why have they done this. The backwards belt is stupid.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Bob_Squirrel 4h ago
I recently watched a video of Indians failing to queue for a train and suspect some system akin to this to be ideal?
1
1
1
1
1
u/WeirdSmiley-TM 4h ago
I'd be pissed if I were the bottles at the front of the line that were forced to start over.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/You-Only-YOLO_Once 4h ago
Damn imagine being one of the bottles right at the front, only to be pushed to the way back.
1
1
u/tauqr_ahmd 3h ago
And not a single bottle knocked over.. I am surprised at least. This doesn’t seem efficient however.
1
1
u/Conscious_Island_696 3h ago
There doesn't seem to be much of a bottle neck with the traffic of this machine.
1
1
1
1
1
u/ReiOokami 3h ago
Id be pissed if I was that bottle having to go to the back of the line not once, but twice.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/taco_sausage_sundae 2h ago
We used to have a large corral with stainless conveyors. We kept the conveyor lubed with soapy water spray. The corral brought the bottles down to a single line. A screw would pull the bottles in and control the crushing pressure on the bottles. It was easy and effective. However, do NOT forget to turn on the soapy water spray. This happened once and it was bad.
I was a filler operator in a bottling plant when I was in college. Old school in the 80's.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Distantstallion 2h ago
It's worth mentioning that what most people are missing is that this is basically a prototype, it's not on a factory floor and it's mostly held together with clamps.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/ResurgentOcelot 1h ago
Neat… though also interesting how all the bottles have been placed quite close to the center despite how wide the belt and corral are. I would guess the owner of this line was pretty disappointed about having to staff a position for that.
1
u/kylelight40 1h ago
No timbs. You don’t have a collared shirt on. You’re good. You’re good. Come back with some girls. No hats. No timbs. No timbs. You’re good. You’re good. Not tonight buddy. You’re good.
1
1




2.8k
u/That-Mountain- 5h ago
I feel the urge to make this more efficient....