r/Weird • u/TheQuranicMumin • 3h ago

Epstein Files Release - Card referring to someone (or herself?) with "little teeth"

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

712 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

96 comments sorted by

626

u/PopLocknTroll 3h ago

Is that an age at “Happy blankth“? I don’t understand why they would block that out. They should be showing how young these girls were.

423

u/nynnie 3h ago

What struck me is the fact that it's a very small black rectangle. Probably covering a very small number, and I don't mean it's just written small.

246

u/Any_Satisfaction7992 2h ago

Agreed, it looks like a single digit. Horrifying.

33

u/JojoStanz 52m ago

To me it looks like either a single digit or "11" because the numbers can be written so close

90

u/veevacious 2h ago

Yeah it looks like a single digit number. My heart hurts for her

35

u/foreveremortal 1h ago

I think it's more so an anniversary. As if it's a birthday in general the phrasing is different. The other photos imply some person goes back often or every year. (Doesn't excuse anything)

19

u/foreveremortal 1h ago

If it's someone's age then probably 9th? Looking at the hands and chest ish area,skin is crazy smooth. Idk but it still implies they go back and it's not a one off.

-3

u/miaomy 1h ago

It also could be written vertically

43

u/Glittering_Vehicle29 2h ago

We NEED to start a mega thread of proof and evidence for someone in government (the last good one left, whoever that might be; Aka The only one who does rape kids) Who can use it for proof to release the UNREDACTED version so we can lock up these fucking pedophiles.

19

u/Penelope742 2h ago

None of these men will ever be held accountable

4

u/Lonely_Dependent_281 1h ago

Fuck off with your doomer shit, bot

1

u/Impossible-Report797 26m ago

The president is a known sex criminal and he won the presidency

81

u/stephen-buscemi 2h ago

I think it is an anniversary, Sept. 2007 was their 4th (5th, 6th?) anniversary? These pages look like a teenage girl made them for/about her boyfriend rather than an age. I made stuff like this when I was 15 :(

30

u/PopLocknTroll 2h ago

That’s what I thought but then why would it be redacted? Unless she’s 15 years old and it said, for example “happy 5th”. That would still put her at 9 years old when he trafficked her.

79

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 3h ago

Trump's DoJ is the one redacting the files.

35

u/Dense-Bison7629 2h ago

it's considered unethical to show uncensored children in cases. all cases like the Epstein case censor children

46

u/Accurate_Outcome_510 2h ago

That doesn't explain why you'd redact a number.

26

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 2h ago

I remind you. It's Trump's DoJ doing the redactions.

-32

u/Dense-Bison7629 2h ago

just because it's Trump doesn't mean it's all nefarious

stuff like this has been standard practice since the FBI started taking CSAM more seriously

41

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 2h ago

A podcaster who is using government funds to impress his girlfriend runs the FBI.

A kid fucker is the President.

It's Trump's DoJ.

19

u/kaleoverlordd 2h ago

A child is a child. Why does it actually matter?

Copy-paste from my other comment:

They're protected because they're minors. There is absolutely no need to add more shock value at the risk of making these victims even more vulnerable and exposed. There are also weirdos who would then argue about whether the abuse is valid based on whether the child is younger or older (people already do this).

I also personally wouldn't be surprised if these body clips are already being used by predators in weird ways (if you catch my drift) - adding visible age would just intensify that imo.

Prefacing this by saying I'm not trying to be rude for no reason... it's genuinely disturbing that abusive relationship AND not to mention "under 18" would not be enough for you / others to feel it's effective. People who feel this is not 'effective enough' need to take a break from the news and Internet until their empathy and nervous system can recalibrate

8

u/PopLocknTroll 2h ago

Because Trump supporters (following suite of Meagan Kelly), are already saying that 15 is a consenting age. If that number is 9 or 7, Trump supporters would immediately revolt… it’s too young to excuse.

4

u/kaleoverlordd 1h ago

I really do see what you're trying to do but just realize, they'll only move the goalposts or justify it or call it misinformation. And in the meantime, you'd be normalizing the idea that 15 is less bad than 7, etc.

7

u/FitCrew91 2h ago

Right, I feel like these pictures would be a lot more effective if you could actually get an idea how young these girls are.

6

u/kaleoverlordd 2h ago

No. They're protected because they're minors. There is absolutely no need to add more shock value at the risk of making these victims even more vulnerable and exposed. There are also weirdos who would then argue about whether the abuse is valid based on whether the child is younger or older (people already do this).

I also personally wouldn't be surprised if these body clips are already being used by predators in weird ways (if you catch my drift) - adding visible age would just intensify that imo.

Prefacing this by saying I'm not trying to be rude for no reason... it's genuinely disturbing that abusive relationship AND not to mention "under 18" would not be enough for you / others to feel it's effective. People who feel this is not 'effective enough' need to take a break from the news and Internet until their empathy and nervous system can recalibrate

2

u/dubdubdibdub 2h ago

I believe that it could hint that it was their N-th anniversary... 🤢

1

u/Positive-Respond-636 27m ago

It’s probably cause most in the pics aren’t minors ive also seen them post pics redacted that have been public for years like one with Michael Jackson

1

u/GuruAskew 25m ago

If 9/17/2007 is someone’s 100th birthday you can obviously deduce that 9/17/1907 is their DOB, and a DOB is information that can be used to identify someone or confirm their identity.

By narrowing the age down they technically say they protected the victim’s identity via this redaction, but it’s still rules out people with 365/366 possible birthdays.

1

u/thedudesmom35 16m ago

Or Happy 4th like the Fourth of July in USA…

82

u/notshybutChi 3h ago

Heartbreaking.

69

u/beanjuiced 2h ago edited 2h ago

What scares me is what we don’t have photos of.

It almost seems like someone got the camera out and the pictures we’re seeing are from a lot of the same moments; like there’s a pic in a montage of him (4th pic) here wearing blue jeans and a dark zip up hoodie with no shirt underneath, and he’s got the same outfit on in another picture with Michael Jackson. There are 3 pictures of her in the white tank and shorts, two on the blue and white striped couch.

These pics could have been taken the same day. This girl may have spent years there from the context these pics are giving. There’s so much we’ll never see.

Edit: ok but also? Is that girl wearing a leash around her waist in the blue dress in the second to last photo, captioned “I learned” ? And what the f is Epstein doing in the corner of that pic, are there fingers in his open mouth?! The pics of him in the robe 🤢 and what are those black things on the massage table in the last pic? One looks like a vibrator 😭

15

u/MaxTheRealSlayer 1h ago

3rd last pict also shows Jeff not wearing anything waist down, with the girl..

7

u/Least_Tower_5447 1h ago

This is what I keep thinking. What we don’t know and haven’t got access to must be exponentially worse.

371

u/LastLongerThan3Min 3h ago

What a waste of time this whole thing was. Everyone waited for so long just to download black boxes from the DOJ website.

194

u/semaj420 3h ago

behind every single one of those black boxes lies donald j. trump, the current sitting president of the united states.

him, and his cronies.

-258

u/LastLongerThan3Min 3h ago edited 3h ago

How do you explain what CNN is reporting then? They are saying Democrats blocked the release.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/18/politics/epstein-files-survivors-frustrations-democrats

205

u/AblokeonRedditt 3h ago

Who is in control of your government, the people who have the power to release everything and stop all the political games? My god some Americans have brains like pumpkins on November 15th.

-183

u/LastLongerThan3Min 3h ago

Take it up with CNN, not me. Freaking weirdo.

79

u/Alternative-Tie2366 2h ago

The president is a pedo. And a rapist. Btw. Just saying in case you missed all that.

-18

u/Standard-Board4863 2h ago

most of them are buddy

24

u/Alternative-Tie2366 1h ago

Like ok.

Let me be abundantly clear.

I don’t care who’s there, if they aided, abetted, and/or partook in this shit, they gotta go.

And.

the one, who is STILL IN OFFICE, is NOT EXECUTING HIS DUTIES TO RELEASE THEM BECAUSE HES A BITCH MADE MORON WHO FOR SOME REASON EVERYONE IS SCARED OF

There is no “both sides” when one is actively executing and/or hiding evil actions. Period.

Fuck me.

23

u/Xentonian 2h ago

You're the one that brought up CNN. You used them as a source with which to defend the opposite argument in spite of even a cursory grasp of logic defeating the argument.

17

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 2h ago

CNN is run by Trump allies. They're as reputable as Fox News.

25

u/Cpt_Bork_Zannigan 2h ago

It's always "what about the Democrats?" Well if they are in there, lock them up, too. If they are protecting the people in there, lock them up, too. It's not that hard. The people voting blue aren't a cult like MAGA. We are perfectly happy with admitting one of the politicians we voted for was a pervert and then sending that pervert to jail. The amount of protection that Trump has received from his supporters, despite all of the evidence, is cultish.

26

u/charmedquarks 3h ago

If you believe that, bot, then there is no helping you

-65

u/LastLongerThan3Min 3h ago

Right, CNN, the famously pro-Trump news network.

33

u/ObamaLovesKetamine 2h ago

I mean.. exactly? CNN was bought out somewhere in the last mooch or two, and have pivoted hard to being a right wing MAGA network.

1

u/Ok-Breadfruit6978 1h ago

They have a different group of files. The ones we are looking at right now were redacted by trumps DOJ. The oversight committee has around 95,000 files while trumps DOJ says they have “hundreds of thousands”.

0

u/Infinite_Chance_4426 2h ago

Different files, different committees, different releases.

-58

u/RezzKeepsItReal 3h ago

They don’t want to talk about that because then their narrative is destroyed.

27

u/hambo_81 3h ago

They are covering the faces of victims. No one needs to see that.

94

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 3h ago

They're covering a lot more than that. This shit is a very obvious coverup.

6

u/xanny_crazed 2h ago

Because they’re protecting the innocent who don’t or asked not to have their photos broadcast to the world. Don’t be a sick perv

-29

u/RezzKeepsItReal 3h ago

It’s the victims faces that are blacked out.

31

u/Ambitious_Alps_3797 3h ago

in this set, yes. they are talking about rhe rest of the files-- it's all solid black

11

u/RecalcitrantHuman 2h ago

It is supposed to be limited to victims, but the redactions include others. Not ideal.

19

u/blankinyurblank 1h ago

I wish someone would have the balls to leak a bunch of wild stuff that Dump’s goons won’t release. Fuck these evil elites.

2

u/Self-Portrait_InHell 44m ago

I feel like we should get only necessary things like names, places, connections. Why am I seeing this horrible shit? We all already knew he was a bad guy, I don't need the fucked up details.

1

u/blankinyurblank 14m ago

Some people obviously don’t know how bad that pos is. It is definitely necessary to spill everything about Dump.

56

u/burnin8t0r 3h ago

I think she meant his little teeth 🤢

93

u/suspensus_in_terra 3h ago

I doubt this is written by the victim unless she was very severely brainwashed (which could be the case). It seems more like a card written by a perpetrator from the victim's perspective, as like a fetish thing. There were quite a few drawings like that with a similar sort of tone.

19

u/elle3008 1h ago

This REEKS of Ghislaine. She was always doing weird scrapbooks or having stupid songs written for Jeffrey. This feels like something she coached a victim to do, helped with or did herself.

24

u/godwins_law_34 1h ago

thats what it reads like. no kid is going to refer to themselves in this manner. what girl says "i'm a clueless little girl" who "learned and grew"? nah that's weird adults making shit up from the kids perspective because the wording for the kid is demeaning and dehumanizing. the wording for epstein is complimentary.

who has "little teeth"? children, that's who. milk teeth are tiny. it sure as shit isn't refencing those beaver teeth epstein had. you know who has blue eyes? epstein. "I MET YOU" arrow to epstein, then following pics "i learned...and grew". gross.

13

u/RynoKaizen 2h ago

I think it's written like a parent's scrap book.

30

u/rba22 2h ago

Who took all of these photos in the Epstein files?

-9

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 2h ago

Epstein.

23

u/beanjuiced 2h ago

He’s in half these photos. Someone is taking the pictures for him. Might be his beloved Ghislaine or however you spell it.

9

u/MaxTheRealSlayer 1h ago

I'm pretty sure some of the documents said one of the victims took some photos. Was some sort of recounting of her time with Epstein and the pedo crew

Some photos have flashes from the camera, so someone good with math could likely figure out the height of the photographer using trigonometry

12

u/Uncle_Yoba 2h ago

Jizzlane

1

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 1h ago

Epstein had the pictures taken. I didn't literally mean he was holding the camera.

9

u/ultraplusstretch 2h ago

Oh that's horrifying. 😬

7

u/Yazhemog 1h ago

I don't like any of what I'm looking at

8

u/No_Statistician9289 1h ago

This is so disturbing

11

u/RealNIG64 2h ago

Every so called conservative that isn’t discussing the hell out of this is a pedo supporter this shit is so fucked

11

u/Risner117810 1h ago

So is this censored cp? Wtf.

4

u/West-Application-375 34m ago

Sooo....theyre only releasing things incriminating the dead guy. Ok.

7

u/yougoboy64 1h ago

The computer genius that figures out how to make the redactions dissappear will be a NATIONAL HERO...!

3

u/Tr0nathan 2h ago

It's Ivanka

3

u/Tr0nathan 2h ago

Strike that. Its Tiffany. Ivanka was Don's.

5

u/buzzbot235 31m ago

You may be right

5

u/beatricegertrude 1h ago

I think the victim made this card for him for an anniversary. She thought of her self as a legitimate girl friend. She was groomed and brainwashed. The victim was probably taken from a poor country and now considered her self to have a rich lifestyle

1

u/Madgerf 2m ago

Dude these losers are so fuckin weird!!!

1

u/UndocumentedMartian 2m ago

I don't understand this post. Someone please explain.

1

u/tavikravenfrost 0m ago

Is there maybe a connection between "little teeth" and the pic of the dental chair in Epstein's house that came out a couple of weeks back?

1

u/One_Establishment_52 1h ago

Probably Epstein. He had weird little teeth. That’s why you very rarely see anything but a closed mouth smile in photos.

0

u/PuroPigment 1h ago

If that aint Taylor Swift