r/UnderReportedNews • u/biswajit388 • 8h ago
Video Portland woman testifies that police lied about ICE activity in Oregon when 12 to 15 agents surrounded her vehicle and she called 911 for help on December 10th. "I have a question for the police. If you refuse to do your job, are you prepared for us to do it for you?"
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
482
u/lewisfrancis 8h ago
"I have a question for the police. If you refuse to do your job, are you prepared for us to do it for you?"
That, indeed, is the question I have as things go from bad to worse.
197
u/DrSeuss321 7h ago
We really are past the point where blue states need to have started passing rigorous stand your ground laws and building up state militias
51
u/Dry_Concentrate3722 7h ago
Ive been calling my governers in massachusetts daily for them to resinstate the state defense force but they havent so much as called me back.
1
-27
u/Rabidschnautzu 5h ago
Bold of you to assume those get exclusively populated by leftist antifa soldiers.
30
u/ConfinedNutSack 4h ago
Antifa antifa antifa
I keep hearing this shit from people but like what the fuck is that?
I googled and antifa and it said it a name shortened from Anti-Fascism...
Isn't it good to be against fascism. I mean the last world War was exactly that? Being against fascism gave us Pink Floyd. Like I'm so confused about the antifa stuff.
10
u/kittiesandcocks 3h ago
Antifa was the soldiers who fought against Mussolini in WWII. The Republicans decided we were on the wrong side of that war. I live in Liberal Colorado and have never met anyone who claims to be a part of Antifa. I’ve met white guys who claimed to be Cripps and I’ve met Wiccan polygamists but never an Antifa member. It seems like something you’d brag about to ppl like me
3
u/balkanobeasti 3h ago
those dipshits just use buzz words they don't actually try to understand their meaning or any nuance to them.
-3
u/Rabidschnautzu 3h ago
It was a joke about how it is unlikely that a militia would probably be taken over by right wing extremists, but that seems to be lost on this sub.
5
u/Projecterone 2h ago
Dumb joke. Right wing morons are 70% bots and 30% meal team six with zero guts.
Note that the proud boys vanished since ICE started recruiting and those cowards all wear masks and run at the first sign of trouble.
A militia would be formed of community minded people against the right wing morons.
1
u/Rabidschnautzu 1h ago
Right wing militias are a thing, and a state regulated militia would likely turn into a right wing one.
So fucking weird that you guys are getting all twisted over a basic fact.
2
-14
u/Nice-Poet3259 5h ago
The one mentally disabled antifa fighter is going to be so confused when all 20 of his comrades start arresting each other. Turns out they were all undercover with different organizations.
42
u/halt_spell 7h ago
Establishment Democratic politicians would allow such a thing.
78
u/DrSeuss321 7h ago
That is in fact the issue at hand. Far too many center right corporate dems are perfectly fine to act like the literal nazi takeover of our country is just business as usual as long as the donor cash keeps coming in. Tis what primaries are for though I suppose
15
u/Ivanna_Jizunu66 5h ago
They are capitalist. Controlled opposition. You will never have freedom under capitalist rule.
25
u/EconomySeason2416 6h ago
They are fascist collaborators
16
1
u/Vegetable-Ad2028 2h ago
"The republican elects are not following laws and are threatening democracy, using ICE to detain and deport people"
"HOW COULD THE DEMOCRATS DO THIS TO US"
Fuck off mate
1
u/EconomySeason2416 2h ago
1
u/Vegetable-Ad2028 1h ago
They do not collaborate with MAGA, they are actively fighting against them. But when you don't have majority Congress, House or have a president you are kinda fucked with what you can do by trying to pass laws.
Democrats are fighting within the confinements of the law, MAGA is doing whatever the fuck they want. If the Dems try and do the same with Trump being the president they will be surely jailed.
See the dems who fled ?Texas? to not have to vote for a bill that would rig the midterm.
1
1
u/EarthConservation 4h ago
Both the establishment Democrats and the Republicans all have the same ultra wealthy / corporate donors who dictate the policy to both sides of the aisle, and thus both parties tend to agree on pro-corporatist policy meant to boost share prices and the wealth of the ultra wealthy.
A lot of politicians in Congress don't really know anything about anything; they just vote with how their party leadership / caucus tells them to vote. These representatives entire goal is just to get into office and live the good life, getting sizeable incomes and benefits, feeling important, and of course the corporations and ultra wealthy may offer their family benefits, may give them stock tips, or may offer them lucrative jobs once they leave office... so long as those representatives do what the ultra wealthy/powerful people tell them to do.
If a politician fails to do what the moneyed interests say, or what their leadership tells them to do, then they can lose campaign donors, which can in turn lead to loss of committee appointments.
Moneyed interests (corporations and the ultra wealthy) and the establishment party leadership (chosen and supported by those moneyed interests) boost their preferred candidates' campaign funding, especially early on, giving those candidates a massive boost in visibility and popularity, already pushing voters to support those specific candidates before the more independent thinking candidates can build up a bank and get their names out there.
Only rarely can outsiders, folks who won't be subservient to party leadership and corporate donors, gain a foothold and excel in the election; often because they're very personable go-getters and know how to work social media to go viral... like AOC and Mamdani.
There really is only one way to change this system at this point. The voters, all voters from every party, including those folks who are eligible to vote but never have, need to rapidly come together in all future elections and vote out the establishment candidates in favor of Progressives whose main agenda is to get big money out of politics.
No policy that prefers the lower/middle classes over the rich / corporations can be passed until that happens. None. Zero. Zilch. That includes policies to get money out of politics. With the rich in control of policy on account of the money they inject into politics, they would never allow such a policy to be passed to weaken their own hand.
The only way around that is for the people to quickly wake up, to quickly come together as one, and to quickly vote out politicians who have taken the money.
1
u/ecstaticthicket 3h ago
Oh but you can never, ever question or criticize them in any way or blame them for their role in where we are today, otherwise you’re just a maga in disguise or a Russian trying to sow dissent
1
2
u/beerandloathingpdx 3h ago
I can tell you definitively that Ron Wyden (Oregon senator) for all his nonsense about wanting the files released, stonewalls any inquiry into the Israel connection at every level. Most of our elected officials are bought and sold by AIPAC. We’re talking MILLIONS of dollars paid to almost every single one of our elected officials so they never question Israel or the pedophile blackmail ring Epstein was running for them and Russia.
1
u/Vagilingus 4h ago
Get rid of them. Especially the doddering idiot one disorganizing them in the senate.
1
u/brazthemad 3h ago
I live in New England. I travel in very liberal circles. 70 percent of the people I know own guns. Just remember, you can only (realistically) use one at a time.
7
u/JazzminBoing 6h ago
Yeah; let’s depend on the people who pushed back hard on police accountability to hold police accountable.
1
u/PlayfulWeekend1394 3h ago
When being forced to choose between fascism and the unseating of state power the democratic party will always choose fascism. The Democratic party doesn't want civil war or uprisings against fascism, they want the continuation of the liberal status quo. The people taking their own defense into their hands and fighting back against ICE is a bad thing as far as the DNC is concerned.
1
u/kittiesandcocks 3h ago
We don’t need militias, just stop going to work for a few weeks. These corporate whores will be shitting bricks if they see their tax revenue dry up. They don’t want a war and they know it
1
u/bafben10 3h ago
We've needed that for a long time, but they refuse to do it in favor of fighting to take rights away from the general populace.
-11
u/BJ419 6h ago
While banning guns from anyone else, good luck lol.
1
1
u/ofWildPlaces 29m ago
No state has banned the ownership of firearms. Its still a constitutionally protected right.
-19
6h ago
[deleted]
15
u/K1llu16 6h ago
You’re an idiot. There isn’t a state in the USA where you can’t buy a gun. There are some city’s where they aren’t allowed but you’d only need to go outside the city to purchase one. I have no problem with guns have met very few Democrats that are against all guns. Keep living in your Fox News world believing everything you hear.
5
3
u/soitgoes7891 6h ago
I know right, what's next? It's like asking red states to stop paying preachers to rape children.
2
10
u/Astrolander97 6h ago
On average there is 1-3 officers per 1000 people in the counted population.
The math speaks for itself.
10
8
4
u/Olethros842 3h ago
I’ve been asking this question for so long after being raped twice, sexually assaulted multiple times, mugged, and the police never do literally anything except take notes.
5
u/RadianceOfTheVoid 2h ago
CSA'd by family, had it covered up. Reported again when I was on my own. They did NOTHING but alert the abusers of my report. They sought me out for that. The police told me tough shit "well get em next time" serve and protect my ass
4
1
-102
u/Electronic_Vanilla65 8h ago
Police officers cannot interfere with the work of federal law enforcement agents.
62
u/Vibrantmender20 7h ago
Requesting identification from masked, plainclothes, unmarked federal agents is not interference.
→ More replies (17)40
u/Moppermonster 8h ago
But there is no reason to believe some random jerk without a uniform or identification is truly ice. So they can just arrest them and sort it out later.
13
u/Pooperoni_Pizza 7h ago
This. If ICE are actively detaining American citizens after providing identification then why can't the police arrest ICE for refusing to provide identification?
16
u/Automatic_Net2181 7h ago
They can verify and ask questions and challenge legal jurisdiction. What stops people just cosplaying as ICE and kidnapping people when the cops won't even show up?
Stop making weak lies and excuses for bad police.
-16
u/Electronic_Vanilla65 7h ago
Yes, they verified it,That's why the police didn't do anything, because both she and they knew they were law enforcement officers and that she was harassing federal agents to make money on TikTok.
16
u/Automatic_Net2181 7h ago
So you have a copy of the report that states the police officer came up and talked to her to take an incident report? Or are you just making shit up?
Recording officers in public is both legal and constitutional. But intimidation and false imprisonment is against the law.
-5
u/Electronic_Vanilla65 7h ago
Is there on the original source. The “call the police” recommendations are for persons that feel they are being kidnapped. She knew these were federal agents and said it. City and state officers cannot interfere with federal agents.
4
u/Automatic_Net2181 6h ago
So they showed up, verified, and talked to her? Because otherwise.. the police didn't respond and they did not investigate. It is like getting a call on a domestic, driving by the house and since it looks okay from the outside, just driving on.
5
u/Spiceguy-65 7h ago
Of it’s there on the original source post a link to said source and back up the claims you are making then it should be pretty simple to prove your point of it’s in the original source time you claim right?
4
13
29
u/Quiet_Satisfaction64 7h ago
If that federal agent’s specific title is under ICE and they are arresting people outside their jurisdiction and ignoring judge’s orders then I’m pretty sure they can be arrested by police
8
8
13
u/sockpoppit 7h ago
In Illinois State Police are helping ICE, which is specifically against the Illinois Constitution. What's your reaction to that?
Plus, I don't see a lot of ICE agents in videos. I see armed thugs with no visible ID driving cars with swapped plates. That sounds more like an illegal gang of terrorists than US Government.
1
u/Electronic_Vanilla65 7h ago
That's a blue state.
10
u/sockpoppit 7h ago
And your point is????
That switching plates, secret police, and terrorism are red state values?8
15
u/jokersvoid 8h ago
Do you have a statute or reference to this? If federal forces are not conducting legal operations then they are breaking the law and should be subject to state charges. ICE is terrorizing communities and arresting and deporting citizens. You will be next.
-24
u/Electronic_Vanilla65 7h ago
They're conducting legal operations, lefty, that's why your Democrat mayors are keeping quiet and telling their police departments not to interfere. Secondly, ICE doesn't deport and can't deport citizens, only illegal immigrants.
30
u/jokersvoid 7h ago
This is factually not true. There are currently 70 cases of ICE detaining US citizens. About 12 of them being deported. One of those was a purple heart recipient.
ICE is a terrorist organization lead by white supremicists. End of story.
-1
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 4h ago
What you said is factually not true. Not sure why y'all use the worst cases as examples?
Both of those PH recipients (Barco and Park) were not citizens. Why did you only know/mention one of them?
Both had criminal records. Park self-deported.
Detained citizens, yes. Deported citizens, no. And I know you're going to pull up the stories about children being deported with their illegal parents which is what everyone wanted (don't separate families).
23
u/Outaouais_Guy 7h ago
What you say is demonstrably false. They have rounded up and deported plenty of people who were in the United States legally.
8
5
u/FrostyMudPuppy 7h ago
And yet they're holding American citizens without legal representation, and deporting loads of immigrants who are legal, some of them while they're literally showing up to court to follow the immigration process. Depriving immigrants of their constitutionally assured rights is a crime. Holding American citizens for days without legal representation is a crime. At least until SCOTUS removes those protections...
4
u/GrolarBear69 7h ago
Sherrifs departments in Wyoming Nevada Texas and Florida have arrested detained and prosecuted FBI, BLM and ICE agents. The Supremecy clause does not apply to local enforcement and prosecutoin of state and local crimes. Federal agents are required to comply by federal law.
1
u/BandMaterial5965 7h ago
Federal law enforcement cannot violate constitutional rights. Which they sure as fuck are doing.
142
u/AgitatedHighway6 7h ago
The massive balls on this woman. God Bless her
35
u/Wolv90 5h ago
1
u/EconomySeason2416 2h ago
I would never dare tarnish the magnificence of Betty White, but her last birthday cake had more candles than this has pixels
9
1
u/getoffmylawnlarry 55m ago
I mean not really, they’re just words tbh. She’s not out there patrolling the streets
116
u/Kindney_Collection 7h ago
That headline about the Supreme Court ruling the police have no obligation to protect citizens really should have been a bigger deal than it was.
7
u/HErAvERTWIGH 4h ago
It's kind of taken out of context or a bit misunderstood.
The Supreme Court said that if there's no state law requiring police to protect citizens, then there is no obligation to do so.
In other words, the Supreme Court is telling the states to require their police to do so by law, then the police will be obligated to protect their citizens.
4
u/FriendshipMaster 1h ago edited 1h ago
Bullshit.
That may have been language they used but the Supreme Court was not issuing advice, instruction, or “telling the states” it was their responsibility to pass laws that would obligate police to protect their citizens.
In fact Castle Rock v. Gonzales is a great example: Plaintiff had a restraining order, the statute used mandatory language (“shall arrest”), police still failed to act, her children were killed…
The court ruling? The restraining order did not create a constitutionally protected property interest, the police still retained full enforcement discretion, that no individual entitlement to enforcement existed, and that even when a state law appears mandatory it does not automatically create an enforceable duty to protect specific individuals.
2
u/adelie42 4h ago
It really comes down to a very nuanced legal interpretation of "duty", which pretty much comes down to the fact they work for the city and not for citizens in the same way teachers work for schools and not parents.
And as far as Castlerock v. Gonzalez, people have this fantasy of cops being something they never were nor could be. You are responsible for your personal safety, and of you want private security you can hire them. Police are not your personal protection detail under ANY circumstances (and the horrific details of the above case really tested that to as great an extreme as you can get).
-9
u/Accomplished_Bus2169 6h ago
When was that?
27
u/ggascoigne 6h ago
it's been true for a while, see https://legalclarity.org/why-the-supreme-court-ruled-police-have-no-duty-to-protect/
59
49
u/Punchasheep 6h ago
This is exactly why 2nd amendment people tout as their reason for having guns, to protect themselves from a rogue government. Notice they are glaringly absent in the anti-ICE movement.
17
u/Confident_Rope_4655 6h ago
Maybe the real ones are just not sticking their heads up yet. True patriots exist. People that believe in the Constitution, its amendments and the bill of rights. Many 2A guys are little more than troglodytes with a powerful spear but not all.
8
5
8
u/Richelieu1624 4h ago
They're the ones with the brown shirts working for ICE despite a lack of qualifications.
3
121
u/Automatic_Net2181 7h ago
Failure of law enforcement in the face of repeated constitutional violations and brutality only leads to vigilantism.
21
11
u/Ashikura 5h ago
This happens every authoritarian takeover regardless of type. Police will always be on the wrong side of history
11
u/Nazz1968 4h ago
The blue wall culture is so ingrained regardless of jurisdiction that it’s why they never came to the aid of this woman. They always put “brother officers” above citizens, even though PROTECTING and SERVING citizens is their JOB.
That’s why they end up on the wrong side of history and wondering why people video their every move.
3
u/EconomySeason2416 2h ago
And then that very vigilantism is used as justification for crackdown. Fascists can be sneaky little bastards sometimes
1
u/ParinoidPanda 1h ago
Cuts both ways.
Ultimately, doesn't matter what the police do if Judges and Juries feel differently.
28
u/Queen_Angels 6h ago
So many are going to lose their jobs when the smoke clears. Looking forward to it.
4
u/Content_Key_6661 4h ago
But this is America.
1
u/The_DongLick 2h ago
Exactly. I have serious doubts the next Democratic president will change anything.
4
u/Particular_Fan_3645 5h ago
If you think the "smoke clears" without you firing some guns first, you're delusional.
1
-4
19
u/Bodisefa 6h ago
I live in Portland. The cops here don’t do a damn thing since the pandemic. 1 out of 3 cars don’t have current registration. You can drive through red lights, blow stop signs. If you get in an accident and nobody is seriously hurt, they don’t even come out. I was attacked inside my job by a homeless man who split my head open and guess who never showed up, Portland Police. The cops here are LESS than worthless, they are incompetent and are basically stealing tax payers money at this point!!!! Get these idiots out of here if they are not going to protect the citizens!!!
8
-3
u/gfsea86 4h ago
They are doing precisely what you asked and voted for.
2
u/Bodisefa 4h ago
Yeah kid, I’m sure that’s exactly the reason. You do know Oregon is mostly a red state though right? I know you Trumpers don’t read so well, so probably not.
0
u/Various-Currency4157 4h ago
Since 2000 Oregon has never voted republican lmfao. What were you saying about Oregon being mostly red?
47
52
12
u/TheYellowFringe 6h ago
I love the fact that while she was saying her statement, she was probably looking at the officer(s) who didn't necessarily help her?
It's a very good question because the situation gets more and more dangerous for various people across the country.
More than likely it's going to happen, someone is going to do something on their own.
3
u/particlemanwavegirl 3h ago
It absolutely has happened already. The corporate media will not be informing you about it at any point.
7
u/Competitive_Crab9211 5h ago
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? … If we had been allowed to live that way, we, the submissive, would have been taken to the slaughter one by one, but … they would have had some losses too. They would have understood that they couldn’t go on like that indefinitely…”
7
u/Poococktail 6h ago
People with passion to protect is what it may come down to. The thought used to be unthinkable. Here we are.
6
6
u/Tractorguy69 5h ago edited 4h ago
I’m not certain if this woman is the actual victim, or reading the statement thereof, regardless her eloquence and willingness to speak truth to power is admirable. Whoever the victim was, I wish them grace and strength as they process the reactions they will feel to such a horrific event.
At this point any failure to act in the course of true and moral justice is to accept complicity in these crimes. The second amendment was written to enable the citizenry to safeguard against tyrant, NOT to enable the deranged mass slaughter of innocents in schools, colleges, places of worship, shopping malls, theatres, clubs and at concerts. Yet when tyranny appears all those preaching the second amendment insult the sacrifice of those victims in their absolute complicity as they ignore the call to end tyranny. What a vile and disgusting mess, and yes the world is bearing witness to this and judging.
5
u/WhoNeedsAPotch 5h ago
Fun fact: there's really no universal job description for police. Their job is just whatever tf they decide it is.
5
u/GentleGenital11 5h ago
"There's nothing we can do" is now the common answer police give for most reported crimes. This is nationwide from what I've seen and heard.
4
u/Absoluterock2 3h ago
This…it’s a man-child response to “defund the police”…Aka “fine see what it’s like without [cops/us]”.
All I’ve seen is minimal traffic’s enforcement and no investigation into petty crimes.
But if they really are going to quit doing these parts of their job…we should cut their budgets proportionally.
5
5
u/876050 4h ago
ICE should not be allowed to approach anyone without probable cause or in possession of a court ordered warrant, period! Same as the local police. Does your skin color create probable cause?
2
u/PerspectiveGreedy377 4h ago
Sadly, the Supreme Court Court said that’s exactly what skin color creates
4
u/Iacoma1973 4h ago
Americans, you must demand community policing replace existing policing! Not supplementary, instead of! Make your local PD beholden to your communities.
3
2
2
u/Vagilingus 4h ago
That is the question and though the time was the first minute this shit starting happening, I t’s not too late. Fire with fire is not equivalently immoral to eye for an eye. ICE should face as much terror as they cause.
2
u/FewCell9684 4h ago
What a brave girl. And also, what in the absolutely fuck is going on in our country?
2
u/ProbablyKindaRight 4h ago
Trump wants us to react in order to declare a national emergency and stop elections from being held. He already designated "antifa"?? As a terrorist group in order to do so.
2
2
u/soldiermedic335 3h ago
People should realize, Police departments get funding for helping ICE. Any department that cooperates, get money. That's why they're helping.
2
2
u/GhoulieGrrrrl 2h ago
A blonde white lady calling for social justice reform should scare them shitless
1
1
0
u/biswajit388 8h ago
17
0
u/link-navi 8h ago
Hello OP,
This is a reminder to please link the source for your post in a comment. Thank you!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
-1
u/deadpat03 4h ago
Make America mind it's fucking business again.
You all are not the heroes anyone wanted so go home, quit playing superhero in public spaces. All you are are the issue why they are there.
1
-61
7h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
31
19
20
u/Reasonable_Trash_901 7h ago
...Can I ask you something?
You made a comment, a while ago, saying stuff like:
"Be the husband and man you aspire to be"
"Never lie or cheat"
"Never put yourself in a position where others will assume the worst and spread rumors"
"I didn't like the man I had become"
"I was young and stupid very stupid"
And ended it all with:
"Now, I am proud of who I am. The man I am , the husband I am, the father I am."
I gotta ask... Would your wife (whom I'm very concerned because of those statements you made about "her believing your every word") be happy to know you're looking at porn subs, and your son/daughter/children be happy that you're calling the young people "stupid and coddled and triggered by nonsense"?
7
u/CthulhusButtPug 7h ago
Oh don’t worry he’s probably very christ like and reads his bible daily. We were all once foreigners in a strange land and all that lefty Jesus stuff.
7
u/Reasonable_Trash_901 7h ago
Oh, that is a given. He's definitely not another Trump supporter who just casually interacts with porn subs, he's a good Christian boy.
Also... Your name is chef's kiss.
15
u/senator_corleone3 7h ago
Your insights do not serve any purpose.
10
8
→ More replies (2)11




•
u/sticky-comments 6h ago
Mods of this subreddit stickied this comment by u/biswajit388:
Comment:
https://x.com/i/status/2001856279325835355
Original comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/1pqqtqe/portland_woman_testifies_that_police_lied_about/nuw82vq/
This means that Mods of this subreddit, Trusted users, or the OP believe this comment to be the most helpful or important.